Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 23.06.2025 12:18

Russia can stop this any time.
Just in the last 5 years:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Scientists measure a photonic pulse in dozens of dimensions - Earth.com
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What’s next?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Is there any concrete proof that LED face masks actually work?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Is deconstruct sunscreen good for a 16-year-old girl?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Cycling Linked to Lower Risk of Dementia, Study of Half a Million Finds - ScienceAlert
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Thank you.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
The sun's poles have flipped. A spacecraft is watching what happens next. - Mashable